Files
task-6a22c713fd30e81cf315ea04/main.py
T
2026-06-11 16:09:36 +00:00

121 lines
3.5 KiB
Python

# main.py
import os
from typing import TypedDict, Dict
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, END
from langgraph.prebuilt import create_chat_agent
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage, AIMessage
# Define state
class CodeReviewState(TypedDict):
code: str
draft_review: str
criteria_scores: Dict[str, int]
weakest_criterion: str
verdict: str
round: int
max_rounds: int
# LLM
llm = ChatOpenAI(temperature=0)
# Draft review node
async def draft_review(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
prompt = f"""
You are a senior Python developer. Review the following code and provide a concise code review (3-6 bullet points) highlighting what is good and what can be improved.
Code:
{state['code']}
Review:
"""
response = await llm.ainvoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
state['draft_review'] = response.content
return state
# Reflect node
async def reflect(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
prompt = f"""
You are an AI critic evaluating a code review. Assign a score 0-10 for each of the following criteria based on the draft review:
- pep8
- type_hints
- edge_cases
- naming
Provide a JSON object with keys "pep8", "type_hints", "edge_cases", "naming" and integer values.
Also determine the weakest criterion (the one with lowest score) and a verdict: "ok" if all scores >=7, otherwise "needs_revision".
Draft review:
{state['draft_review']}
Output JSON:
"""
response = await llm.ainvoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
import json
scores = json.loads(response.content)
state['criteria_scores'] = scores
weakest = min(scores, key=scores.get)
state['weakest_criterion'] = weakest
state['verdict'] = "ok" if all(v >= 7 for v in scores.values()) else "needs_revision"
return state
# Rewrite node
async def rewrite(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
crit = state['weakest_criterion']
prompt = f"""
You are a senior Python developer. Rewrite the section of the code review that addresses the {crit} criterion, improving it. Keep the rest of the review unchanged.
Original review:
{state['draft_review']}
Rewrite only the part related to {crit}:
"""
response = await llm.ainvoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
# Replace the part in draft_review that mentions crit
# For simplicity, just append the new part
state['draft_review'] = state['draft_review'] + "\n" + response.content
state['round'] += 1
return state
# Build graph
builder = StateGraph(CodeReviewState)
builder.add_node("draft_review", draft_review)
builder.add_node("reflect", reflect)
builder.add_node("rewrite", rewrite)
builder.set_entry_point("draft_review")
builder.add_edge("draft_review", "reflect")
builder.add_conditional_edges(
"reflect",
lambda x: "rewrite" if x["verdict"] == "needs_revision" and x["round"] < x["max_rounds"] else "END",
)
builder.add_edge("rewrite", "reflect")
graph = builder.compile()
# Demo function
async def run_demo():
code = """
# Example function to sort numbers
def sort_numbers(arr):
return sorted(arr)
"""
init_state: CodeReviewState = {
"code": code,
"draft_review": "",
"criteria_scores": {},
"weakest_criterion": "",
"verdict": "",
"round": 0,
"max_rounds": 2,
}
result = await graph.ainvoke(init_state)
print("Final Review:\n", result["draft_review"])
print("Scores:\n", result["criteria_scores"])
print("Verdict:\n", result["verdict"])
if __name__ == "__main__":
import asyncio
asyncio.run(run_demo())