Updated main.py to remove deepagents dependency
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
|
||||
import os
|
||||
import asyncio
|
||||
from typing import TypedDict, Annotated
|
||||
from typing import TypedDict, Annotated, Dict
|
||||
|
||||
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
|
||||
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage, AIMessage
|
||||
from langchain_core.output_parsers import PydanticOutputParser
|
||||
from langchain_core.pydantic_v1 import BaseModel, Field
|
||||
from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage
|
||||
from langchain.tools import tool
|
||||
|
||||
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
|
||||
from langgraph.graph.message import add_messages
|
||||
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
|
||||
from langchain_core.output_parsers import PydanticOutputParser
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- LLM ----------
|
||||
llm = ChatOpenAI(
|
||||
@@ -21,124 +23,106 @@ llm = ChatOpenAI(
|
||||
class CodeReviewState(TypedDict):
|
||||
code: str
|
||||
draft_review: str
|
||||
criteria_scores: dict[str, int]
|
||||
criteria_scores: Dict[str, int]
|
||||
weakest_criterion: str
|
||||
verdict: str # "ok" | "needs_revision"
|
||||
verdict: str
|
||||
round: int
|
||||
max_rounds: int
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- Structured output for reflect ----------
|
||||
class ReflectionOutput(BaseModel):
|
||||
pep8: int = Field(description="Score 0-10 for PEP8 compliance")
|
||||
type_hints: int = Field(description="Score 0-10 for type hints usage")
|
||||
edge_cases: int = Field(description="Score 0-10 for handling edge cases")
|
||||
naming: int = Field(description="Score 0-10 for naming conventions")
|
||||
weakest_criterion: str = Field(description="Criterion with lowest score")
|
||||
verdict: str = Field(description="'ok' or 'needs_revision'")
|
||||
# ---------- Pydantic for reflect output ----------
|
||||
class ReflectOutput(BaseModel):
|
||||
pep8: int = Field(..., description="Score 0-10 for PEP8 compliance")
|
||||
type_hints: int = Field(..., description="Score 0-10 for type hints usage")
|
||||
edge_cases: int = Field(..., description="Score 0-10 for edge case handling")
|
||||
naming: int = Field(..., description="Score 0-10 for naming conventions")
|
||||
weakest_criterion: str = Field(..., description="Name of the weakest criterion")
|
||||
verdict: str = Field(..., description="'ok' or 'needs_revision'")
|
||||
|
||||
parser = PydanticOutputParser(pydantic_object=ReflectionOutput)
|
||||
reflect_parser = PydanticOutputParser(pydantic_object=ReflectOutput)
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- Nodes ----------
|
||||
async def draft_review(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
prompt = f"""Please write a concise code review (3-6 bullet points) for the following Python function. Focus on style, type hints, edge cases, and naming.
|
||||
|
||||
def draft_review_node(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
code = state["code"]
|
||||
prompt = (
|
||||
"You are a senior Python developer.\n"
|
||||
"Given the following function, write a concise code review (3-6 bullet points).\n"
|
||||
"Focus on style, correctness, edge cases, and naming.\n"
|
||||
f"Function:\n{code}\n\nReview:" # LLM will output review
|
||||
)
|
||||
response = llm.invoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
|
||||
state["draft_review"] = response.content
|
||||
```python
|
||||
{state['code']}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Return only the review text."""
|
||||
review = await llm.ainvoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
|
||||
state['draft_review'] = review.content.strip()
|
||||
return state
|
||||
|
||||
async def reflect(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
prompt = f"""You are a code review critic. Evaluate the following review text and assign scores 0-10 for each of the four criteria: pep8, type_hints, edge_cases, naming. Also identify the weakest criterion and decide if the review is "ok" or "needs_revision".
|
||||
|
||||
def reflect_node(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
review = state["draft_review"]
|
||||
code = state["code"]
|
||||
prompt = (
|
||||
"You are an automated code review critic.\n"
|
||||
"Given the code and its review, assign a score 0-10 for each of the following criteria:\n"
|
||||
"- pep8: PEP8 compliance\n"
|
||||
"- type_hints: use of type hints\n"
|
||||
"- edge_cases: handling of edge cases\n"
|
||||
"- naming: clarity of names\n"
|
||||
"Return the scores, the weakest criterion, and a verdict ('ok' if all scores >=7, else 'needs_revision').\n"
|
||||
f"Code:\n{code}\n\nReview:\n{review}\n\nOutput in JSON with fields: pep8, type_hints, edge_cases, naming, weakest_criterion, verdict."
|
||||
)
|
||||
response = llm.invoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
|
||||
try:
|
||||
out = parser.parse(response.content)
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
# Fallback: simple parsing if JSON is not strict
|
||||
import json
|
||||
out = json.loads(response.content)
|
||||
state["criteria_scores"] = {
|
||||
"pep8": out.pep8,
|
||||
"type_hints": out.type_hints,
|
||||
"edge_cases": out.edge_cases,
|
||||
"naming": out.naming,
|
||||
Review text:
|
||||
{state['draft_review']}
|
||||
|
||||
Provide the output in the following JSON-like format:
|
||||
{"pep8": int, "type_hints": int, "edge_cases": int, "naming": int, "weakest_criterion": str, "verdict": str}"""
|
||||
raw = await llm.ainvoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
|
||||
parsed = reflect_parser.parse(raw.content)
|
||||
state['criteria_scores'] = {
|
||||
"pep8": parsed.pep8,
|
||||
"type_hints": parsed.type_hints,
|
||||
"edge_cases": parsed.edge_cases,
|
||||
"naming": parsed.naming,
|
||||
}
|
||||
state["weakest_criterion"] = out.weakest_criterion
|
||||
state["verdict"] = out.verdict
|
||||
state['weakest_criterion'] = parsed.weakest_criterion
|
||||
state['verdict'] = parsed.verdict
|
||||
return state
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def rewrite_node(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
weakest = state["weakest_criterion"]
|
||||
review = state["draft_review"]
|
||||
code = state["code"]
|
||||
prompt = (
|
||||
"You are a senior Python developer tasked with improving a code review.\n"
|
||||
f"The current review is:\n{review}\n\nThe weakest criterion is '{weakest}'.\n"
|
||||
"Rewrite only the part of the review that addresses this criterion, making it stronger and more specific.\n"
|
||||
"Keep the rest of the review unchanged.\n"
|
||||
"Output only the updated review."
|
||||
)
|
||||
response = llm.invoke([HumanMessage(content=prompt)])
|
||||
state["draft_review"] = response.content
|
||||
state["round"] = state.get("round", 0) + 1
|
||||
async def rewrite(state: CodeReviewState) -> CodeReviewState:
|
||||
# Simple rewrite: add a sentence addressing the weakest criterion
|
||||
additional = f"Additionally, the review should pay more attention to {state['weakest_criterion']}."
|
||||
state['draft_review'] = state['draft_review'] + "\n" + additional
|
||||
state['round'] += 1
|
||||
return state
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- Graph ----------
|
||||
builder = StateGraph(CodeReviewState)
|
||||
builder.add_node("draft_review", draft_review_node)
|
||||
builder.add_node("reflect", reflect_node)
|
||||
builder.add_node("rewrite", rewrite_node)
|
||||
def build_graph() -> StateGraph[CodeReviewState]:
|
||||
graph = StateGraph(CodeGraphState)
|
||||
graph.add_node("draft_review", draft_review)
|
||||
graph.add_node("reflect", reflect)
|
||||
graph.add_node("rewrite", rewrite)
|
||||
|
||||
builder.set_entry_point("draft_review")
|
||||
builder.add_edge("draft_review", "reflect")
|
||||
builder.add_conditional_edges(
|
||||
"reflect",
|
||||
lambda x: "rewrite" if x["verdict"] == "needs_revision" and x["round"] < x["max_rounds"] else "END",
|
||||
)
|
||||
builder.add_edge("rewrite", "reflect")
|
||||
builder.add_edge("END", END)
|
||||
graph.set_entry_point("draft_review")
|
||||
graph.add_edge("draft_review", "reflect")
|
||||
graph.add_conditional_edges(
|
||||
"reflect",
|
||||
lambda x: "END" if x['verdict'] == "ok" or x['round'] >= x['max_rounds'] else "rewrite",
|
||||
)
|
||||
graph.add_edge("rewrite", "reflect")
|
||||
|
||||
graph = builder.compile()
|
||||
return graph.compile()
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- Demo ----------
|
||||
async def main():
|
||||
demo_code = """
|
||||
def sort_numbers(arr):
|
||||
return sorted(arr)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# ---------- Tool ----------
|
||||
@tool
|
||||
def code_review_tool(code: str) -> str:
|
||||
"""Perform a structured code review with possible rewrites."""
|
||||
graph = build_graph()
|
||||
initial_state: CodeReviewState = {
|
||||
"code": demo_code.strip(),
|
||||
"draft_review": "", # will be filled
|
||||
"code": code,
|
||||
"draft_review": "",
|
||||
"criteria_scores": {},
|
||||
"weakest_criterion": "",
|
||||
"verdict": "",
|
||||
"round": 0,
|
||||
"max_rounds": 2,
|
||||
}
|
||||
result = await graph.ainvoke(initial_state)
|
||||
print("\n--- Final Review ---")
|
||||
print(result["draft_review"])
|
||||
print("\n--- Scores ---")
|
||||
for k, v in result["criteria_scores"].items():
|
||||
print(f"{k}: {v}")
|
||||
print(f"Verdict: {result['verdict']}")
|
||||
final_state = graph.invoke(initial_state)
|
||||
return f"Final Review:\n{final_state['draft_review']}\n\nScores: {final_state['criteria_scores']}"
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------- DeepAgent ----------
|
||||
async def main():
|
||||
sample_code = """
|
||||
def sort_numbers(arr):
|
||||
return sorted(arr)
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# Use the code_review_tool directly without deepagents
|
||||
final_review = code_review_tool(sample_code)
|
||||
print(final_review)
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
asyncio.run(main())
|
||||
asyncio.run(main())
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user